<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Choosing a wiki for collaborative curriculum design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://openeducationresearch.org/2008/11/choosing-a-wiki-for-collaborative-curriculum-design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://openeducationresearch.org/2008/11/choosing-a-wiki-for-collaborative-curriculum-design/</link>
	<description>Research in open education and education research in the open.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2011 13:17:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MARTINIAMINC</title>
		<link>http://openeducationresearch.org/2008/11/choosing-a-wiki-for-collaborative-curriculum-design/comment-page-1/#comment-2844</link>
		<dc:creator>MARTINIAMINC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 03:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openeducationresearch.org/?p=9#comment-2844</guid>
		<description>We are Here For Your Success!&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.martiniaminc.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.martiniaminc.com&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are Here For Your Success!<br /><a href="http://www.martiniaminc.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.martiniaminc.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MARTINIAMINC</title>
		<link>http://openeducationresearch.org/2008/11/choosing-a-wiki-for-collaborative-curriculum-design/comment-page-1/#comment-2833</link>
		<dc:creator>MARTINIAMINC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 01:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openeducationresearch.org/?p=9#comment-2833</guid>
		<description>We are concern about, reading, writing and critical thinking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are concern about, reading, writing and critical thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Concilus</title>
		<link>http://openeducationresearch.org/2008/11/choosing-a-wiki-for-collaborative-curriculum-design/comment-page-1/#comment-766</link>
		<dc:creator>John Concilus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 06:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openeducationresearch.org/?p=9#comment-766</guid>
		<description>Steve,

Sounds like a great project there in Pittsburgh. I&#039;ll be interested in how it goes for them, and appreciate your insights.

As an administrator in charge of an ongoing school effort with teachers and students specifically to collaboratively build curriculum with wiki tools, I highly recommend Mediawiki. It has power, stability, and a wide range of plug ins provided by a very active and committed Open Source developer community.

In BSSD, our users have had very little need for training, and have created over 11,500 pages of content to support our standards-based model of education. This includes text, documents, videos, audio, multimedia projects.

Most recently we have partnered with the wonderful folks at the Palo Alto Research Center to pilot PARC&#039;s WikiDashboard tool for visualization of collaborative work being done in the system.  This promises to be very useful, and is working like a charm so far.

I&#039;d be happy to exchange information on our experiences with other like-minded school districts.  My work email is jconcilus@bssd.org.  I have also blogged in more detail on open content curriculum issues, and Mediawiki at my personal blog:

http://www.teachers4schools.com/open/

Regards,

John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve,</p>
<p>Sounds like a great project there in Pittsburgh. I&#8217;ll be interested in how it goes for them, and appreciate your insights.</p>
<p>As an administrator in charge of an ongoing school effort with teachers and students specifically to collaboratively build curriculum with wiki tools, I highly recommend Mediawiki. It has power, stability, and a wide range of plug ins provided by a very active and committed Open Source developer community.</p>
<p>In BSSD, our users have had very little need for training, and have created over 11,500 pages of content to support our standards-based model of education. This includes text, documents, videos, audio, multimedia projects.</p>
<p>Most recently we have partnered with the wonderful folks at the Palo Alto Research Center to pilot PARC&#8217;s WikiDashboard tool for visualization of collaborative work being done in the system.  This promises to be very useful, and is working like a charm so far.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be happy to exchange information on our experiences with other like-minded school districts.  My work email is <a href="mailto:jconcilus@bssd.org">jconcilus@bssd.org</a>.  I have also blogged in more detail on open content curriculum issues, and Mediawiki at my personal blog:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.teachers4schools.com/open/" rel="nofollow">http://www.teachers4schools.com/open/</a></p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Concilus</title>
		<link>http://openeducationresearch.org/2008/11/choosing-a-wiki-for-collaborative-curriculum-design/comment-page-1/#comment-2926</link>
		<dc:creator>John Concilus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 06:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openeducationresearch.org/?p=9#comment-2926</guid>
		<description>Steve,

Sounds like a great project there in Pittsburgh. I&#039;ll be interested in how it goes for them, and appreciate your insights.

As an administrator in charge of an ongoing school effort with teachers and students specifically to collaboratively build curriculum with wiki tools, I highly recommend Mediawiki. It has power, stability, and a wide range of plug ins provided by a very active and committed Open Source developer community.

In BSSD, our users have had very little need for training, and have created over 11,500 pages of content to support our standards-based model of education. This includes text, documents, videos, audio, multimedia projects.

Most recently we have partnered with the wonderful folks at the Palo Alto Research Center to pilot PARC&#039;s WikiDashboard tool for visualization of collaborative work being done in the system.  This promises to be very useful, and is working like a charm so far.

I&#039;d be happy to exchange information on our experiences with other like-minded school districts.  My work email is jconcilus@bssd.org.  I have also blogged in more detail on open content curriculum issues, and Mediawiki at my personal blog:

http://www.teachers4schools.com/open/

Regards,

John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve,</p>
<p>Sounds like a great project there in Pittsburgh. I&#8217;ll be interested in how it goes for them, and appreciate your insights.</p>
<p>As an administrator in charge of an ongoing school effort with teachers and students specifically to collaboratively build curriculum with wiki tools, I highly recommend Mediawiki. It has power, stability, and a wide range of plug ins provided by a very active and committed Open Source developer community.</p>
<p>In BSSD, our users have had very little need for training, and have created over 11,500 pages of content to support our standards-based model of education. This includes text, documents, videos, audio, multimedia projects.</p>
<p>Most recently we have partnered with the wonderful folks at the Palo Alto Research Center to pilot PARC&#8217;s WikiDashboard tool for visualization of collaborative work being done in the system.  This promises to be very useful, and is working like a charm so far.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be happy to exchange information on our experiences with other like-minded school districts.  My work email is <a href="mailto:jconcilus@bssd.org">jconcilus@bssd.org</a>.  I have also blogged in more detail on open content curriculum issues, and Mediawiki at my personal blog:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.teachers4schools.com/open/" rel="nofollow">http://www.teachers4schools.com/open/</a></p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jordan</title>
		<link>http://openeducationresearch.org/2008/11/choosing-a-wiki-for-collaborative-curriculum-design/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 20:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openeducationresearch.org/?p=9#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Hi All,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I&#039;ve looked into this on our internal version of sites, and it&#039;s true...there is not a good way to limit someone&#039;s access to one page and not to another.  The workaround here is to use a Google Doc or Spreadsheet for content on a particular page, and limit people&#039;s access to edit that way.  Such that they could only view the page, not edit the document.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Jordan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi All,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve looked into this on our internal version of sites, and it&#8217;s true&#8230;there is not a good way to limit someone&#8217;s access to one page and not to another.  The workaround here is to use a Google Doc or Spreadsheet for content on a particular page, and limit people&#8217;s access to edit that way.  Such that they could only view the page, not edit the document.  </p>
<p>Jordan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jordan</title>
		<link>http://openeducationresearch.org/2008/11/choosing-a-wiki-for-collaborative-curriculum-design/comment-page-1/#comment-2925</link>
		<dc:creator>jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 20:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openeducationresearch.org/?p=9#comment-2925</guid>
		<description>Hi All,I&#039;ve looked into this on our internal version of sites, and it&#039;s true...there is not a good way to limit someone&#039;s access to one page and not to another.  The workaround here is to use a Google Doc or Spreadsheet for content on a particular page, and limit people&#039;s access to edit that way.  Such that they could only view the page, not edit the document.  Jordan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi All,I&#8217;ve looked into this on our internal version of sites, and it&#8217;s true&#8230;there is not a good way to limit someone&#8217;s access to one page and not to another.  The workaround here is to use a Google Doc or Spreadsheet for content on a particular page, and limit people&#8217;s access to edit that way.  Such that they could only view the page, not edit the document.  Jordan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Turadg</title>
		<link>http://openeducationresearch.org/2008/11/choosing-a-wiki-for-collaborative-curriculum-design/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Turadg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 02:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openeducationresearch.org/?p=9#comment-5</guid>
		<description>The main reason I chose that &quot;collaborative curriculum&quot; focus for the post was that I thought it would be broadly applicable.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I&#039;m happy to use this comment thread to discuss the more general goal of supporting Pgh Sci-Tech with online collaborative systems.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I would argue that you don&#039;t have to choose one system for all the ~3 needs that Stephen enumerated.  The collaborations in (1) sound like basic business needs and would be satisfied by online office suites such as Google Docs+Calendar or Zoho Office.  Better to use tools designed for each of those tasks than to make a wiki do everything.  As for (2a), I think a wiki is right on and the options I describe above are best.  (2b) covers a lot of ground, but depending on the specifics you have in mind, the above are still good choices.  For (3), I also think wiki is the right choice and the above are the best options.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Moodle is a platform to definitely bear in mind.  It&#039;s a popular way to author and deliver courseware.  To my knowledge though, it does little to support collaboration around that authoring.  I think it&#039;s wiki module is for embedding a wiki within a course.  Moodle may be appropriate if you will be having teachers author materials that students will use online, but doesn&#039;t cover full curriculum design.  If I am wrong, I&#039;d love to be corrected.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Based on my understanding of your needs, my recommendation is to use one of the wiki systems above in combination with an office suite.  In particular, I would lean to:&lt;br /&gt;- PbWiki for curriculum development&lt;br /&gt;- Google Docs for spreadsheets and word processing documents such as mission statements&lt;br /&gt;- Google Calendar for calendaring&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And if appropriate, consider:&lt;br /&gt;- Moodle for authoring online activities for students and teachers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The main reason I chose that &#8220;collaborative curriculum&#8221; focus for the post was that I thought it would be broadly applicable.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m happy to use this comment thread to discuss the more general goal of supporting Pgh Sci-Tech with online collaborative systems.</p>
<p>I would argue that you don&#8217;t have to choose one system for all the ~3 needs that Stephen enumerated.  The collaborations in (1) sound like basic business needs and would be satisfied by online office suites such as Google Docs+Calendar or Zoho Office.  Better to use tools designed for each of those tasks than to make a wiki do everything.  As for (2a), I think a wiki is right on and the options I describe above are best.  (2b) covers a lot of ground, but depending on the specifics you have in mind, the above are still good choices.  For (3), I also think wiki is the right choice and the above are the best options.</p>
<p>Moodle is a platform to definitely bear in mind.  It&#8217;s a popular way to author and deliver courseware.  To my knowledge though, it does little to support collaboration around that authoring.  I think it&#8217;s wiki module is for embedding a wiki within a course.  Moodle may be appropriate if you will be having teachers author materials that students will use online, but doesn&#8217;t cover full curriculum design.  If I am wrong, I&#8217;d love to be corrected.</p>
<p>Based on my understanding of your needs, my recommendation is to use one of the wiki systems above in combination with an office suite.  In particular, I would lean to:<br />- PbWiki for curriculum development<br />- Google Docs for spreadsheets and word processing documents such as mission statements<br />- Google Calendar for calendaring</p>
<p>And if appropriate, consider:<br />- Moodle for authoring online activities for students and teachers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Turadg Aleahmad</title>
		<link>http://openeducationresearch.org/2008/11/choosing-a-wiki-for-collaborative-curriculum-design/comment-page-1/#comment-2924</link>
		<dc:creator>Turadg Aleahmad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 02:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openeducationresearch.org/?p=9#comment-2924</guid>
		<description>The main reason I chose that &quot;collaborative curriculum&quot; focus for the post was that I thought it would be broadly applicable.I&#039;m happy to use this comment thread to discuss the more general goal of supporting Pgh Sci-Tech with online collaborative systems.I would argue that you don&#039;t have to choose one system for all the ~3 needs that Stephen enumerated.  The collaborations in (1) sound like basic business needs and would be satisfied by online office suites such as Google Docs+Calendar or Zoho Office.  Better to use tools designed for each of those tasks than to make a wiki do everything.  As for (2a), I think a wiki is right on and the options I describe above are best.  (2b) covers a lot of ground, but depending on the specifics you have in mind, the above are still good choices.  For (3), I also think wiki is the right choice and the above are the best options.Moodle is a platform to definitely bear in mind.  It&#039;s a popular way to author and deliver courseware.  To my knowledge though, it does little to support collaboration around that authoring.  I think it&#039;s wiki module is for embedding a wiki within a course.  Moodle may be appropriate if you will be having teachers author materials that students will use online, but doesn&#039;t cover full curriculum design.  If I am wrong, I&#039;d love to be corrected.Based on my understanding of your needs, my recommendation is to use one of the wiki systems above in combination with an office suite.  In particular, I would lean to:- PbWiki for curriculum development- Google Docs for spreadsheets and word processing documents such as mission statements- Google Calendar for calendaringAnd if appropriate, consider:- Moodle for authoring online activities for students and teachers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The main reason I chose that &#8220;collaborative curriculum&#8221; focus for the post was that I thought it would be broadly applicable.I&#8217;m happy to use this comment thread to discuss the more general goal of supporting Pgh Sci-Tech with online collaborative systems.I would argue that you don&#8217;t have to choose one system for all the ~3 needs that Stephen enumerated.  The collaborations in (1) sound like basic business needs and would be satisfied by online office suites such as Google Docs+Calendar or Zoho Office.  Better to use tools designed for each of those tasks than to make a wiki do everything.  As for (2a), I think a wiki is right on and the options I describe above are best.  (2b) covers a lot of ground, but depending on the specifics you have in mind, the above are still good choices.  For (3), I also think wiki is the right choice and the above are the best options.Moodle is a platform to definitely bear in mind.  It&#8217;s a popular way to author and deliver courseware.  To my knowledge though, it does little to support collaboration around that authoring.  I think it&#8217;s wiki module is for embedding a wiki within a course.  Moodle may be appropriate if you will be having teachers author materials that students will use online, but doesn&#8217;t cover full curriculum design.  If I am wrong, I&#8217;d love to be corrected.Based on my understanding of your needs, my recommendation is to use one of the wiki systems above in combination with an office suite.  In particular, I would lean to:- PbWiki for curriculum development- Google Docs for spreadsheets and word processing documents such as mission statements- Google Calendar for calendaringAnd if appropriate, consider:- Moodle for authoring online activities for students and teachers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samuel</title>
		<link>http://openeducationresearch.org/2008/11/choosing-a-wiki-for-collaborative-curriculum-design/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Samuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 17:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openeducationresearch.org/?p=9#comment-4</guid>
		<description>I appreciate the discussion. This is an important decision for our project team. Since we envision the entire curriculum being developed, enhanced, delivered, and constantly improved through the wiki site it is important to go with a company or platform that will still be around in ten years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate the discussion. This is an important decision for our project team. Since we envision the entire curriculum being developed, enhanced, delivered, and constantly improved through the wiki site it is important to go with a company or platform that will still be around in ten years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samuel</title>
		<link>http://openeducationresearch.org/2008/11/choosing-a-wiki-for-collaborative-curriculum-design/comment-page-1/#comment-2923</link>
		<dc:creator>Samuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 17:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openeducationresearch.org/?p=9#comment-2923</guid>
		<description>I appreciate the discussion. This is an important decision for our project team. Since we envision the entire curriculum being developed, enhanced, delivered, and constantly improved through the wiki site it is important to go with a company or platform that will still be around in ten years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate the discussion. This is an important decision for our project team. Since we envision the entire curriculum being developed, enhanced, delivered, and constantly improved through the wiki site it is important to go with a company or platform that will still be around in ten years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

